From: moonchild3321@hotmail.com Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 11:08 AM To: MarketingClaim Subject: comment on docket #LS-05-09 Martin E. O'Conner USDA-AMS, Room 2607-S 1400 Independence Ave, SW Washington, DC 20250 Dear Martin E. O'Conner, Martin E. O'Connor Chief, Standardization Branch Livestock and Seed Program USDA-AMS Room 2607-S 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250-0254 Via E-mail: Marketingclaim@usda.gov Dear Mr. O'Connor; I am writing to comment on Docket #LS-05-09, the United States Standard for Livestock and Meat Marketing Claim, Grass (Forage) Fed Claim. I strongly support the USDA's revision of the grass fed labeling claim so that it requires that grass and/or forage shall be 99% or higher of the energy source for the lifetime of the animal. The requirement ensures that the benefits of a grass fed diet are passed onto consumers. As a consumer, I also assume that other values are encompassed in the grass fed label. Among these values are access to pasture and restriction on the use of certain feed types. In order to ensure that consumers are not misled by the grass fed label, I believe the standard should also include the following requirements: Access to pasture. There is nothing in the current definition that requires these animals be out on pasture. This means that feedlots could feed harvested grass and market that beef as "grass fed." This is misleading and goes against what consumers expect from the label. The USDA should require that a significant amount of the grass come from grass and forage consumed by animals while pasturing. Animals with no access to pasture should not be labeled as grass fed. Prohibit the use of genetically engineered forage. The growth in markets for alternative production standards such as grass fed has been fueled by consumers like myself that do not want their food produced using genetic engineering. USDA should ensure that the grass fed standard is consistent with this consumer desire. The grass fed label should ensure that the grass or forage used as feed is not sourced from pasture or harvested from grasses using genetically engineered varieties of alfalfa, bahiagrass, tall fescue, Italian ryegrass or other such grasses. Include dairy products. The standard should be written so as to clearly indicate that dairy products derived from livestock meeting the grass fed standard can be marketed using grass fed claims. Thank you for taking my comments into consideration. Sincerely, Debra Siegel-Furlin 1763 Main Street 108B Dunedin, Florida 34698