From: jxc555@gmail.com Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 4:52 PM To: MarketingClaim Subject: Docket LS-05-09 Relative to the comments being accepted concerning a grass-fed beef claim, I wish to make some statements. First, this step is a very necessary and useful one to the collective beef industry. The grass-fed enterprise suffers from a lack of continuity in the description of it's products, and this has caused confusion to both producers and to customers for grass-fed beef. The definition of 1% non-grass or forage fed post-weaning may be too confining for the production of an acceptable product for the customer and for profit potential to the producer. In the general case, this would imply only 45 lbs. of non-grass or forage feed dry matter would be allowed (600 lbs. of animal weight added at 7.5 lbs. of feed dry matter per pound of weight gain.) This amount is insufficient to allow adequate animal weight gains during non-grazing periods. Extensive research in Argentina (Pordomingo et al., 2004, 2005) has shown it is necessary to maintain .8 to 1.0 kg/day weight gain to maintain production efficiency and to provide meat products with a high acceptability to customers. Seventy-five percent of beef producers in the US work with an environment of periods of zero plant growth, and only the highest quality stored forages will result in weight gains approaching 1.0 kg/day. The grass-fed, natural, and organic segments of the food industry are poised to significantly change the supply of these products, but they must be supplied in a profitable manner. "Cottage" industries can survive with 99-100% grass-fed beef, but a grass-fed production unit cannot. Further, an increase in the customer base for grass-fed beef will be predicated on acceptability of this product in relation to traditional beef, chicken, and pork. Consumer research shows the priority for beef-buying decisions are for taste and eating satisfaction. The future growth of the grass-fed beef enterprise-with the validity and consistency supplied by a process verification label from USDA-will be determined by buying decisions which have a high priority for quality and taste. Please be sure the process verification label standards do not diminish this potential. -- Dr. John Comerford Associate Professor 324 Henning Bulding University Park, PA 16802 814-863-3661 814-865-7442 FAX